Processing and Damage Tolerance of Continuous Carbon Fiber Composites Containing Puncture-Self-Healing Thermoplastic Matrix

Home / Articles / External Non-Government

March 1, 2016 | Originally published by Date Line: March 1 on

The initiation and propagation of damage ultimately results in failure of aircraft structural components. Often, impact damage is difficult to identify in-service, and hence design of continuous carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composite structure involves up to a 50{e533b13ff70ae9e93b2537162b40cc94235d9ebe58cd3c48afaf7e201b9cf588} knockdown in the undamaged failure strength allowable. If damage is identified in a composite structure, the vehicle must be grounded for structural repair. This involves the grinding away of damaged regions and drilled holes to secure patches. By providing a polymer matrix with the ability to self-heal after impact damage is incurred, vehicle safety is greatly improved by increasing the design allowable for strength, resulting in more efficient CFRP structure.

Self-healing polymeric materials have been defined as materials that have the built-in capability to substantially recover their load-transferring ability after damage. Such recovery can occur autonomously or be activated after application of a specific stimulus (e.g. heat or radiation). Effective self-healing requires that these materials heal quickly following low- to mid-velocity impacts, while retaining structural integrity. At Langley Research Center, an amorphous thermoplastic has been identified that self-heals at ~50 °C after through-penetration by a 9.03-mm-diameter bullet at 400 m/sec. Continuous CFRP composites have been processed with this thermoplastic, and the damage tolerance of this material in comparison to reported values for thermosetting-toughened epoxy CFRP have been determined.

The appearance of external hyperlinks on this DTIC website does not constitute endorsement by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) of the linked websites, or the information, products or services contained therein. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the United States DoD.