Army Developing Weapons with 1,000-Mile Range

Home / Articles / External Non-Government

breaking_defense_pershing_ii_missiles

October 8, 2018 | Originally published by Date Line: October 8 on

For the first time since the Soviet Union fell, the Army is developing weapons with a thousand-mile range. That’s roughly five times the range of anything the Army fields today and three times the range of previously announced programs. The payoff in a future war with Russia or China could be dramatic – but the technological, financial and even legal problems are daunting.

The ambition? Develop not one but two types of ultra-long-range missiles to help blow holes in advanced air defenses:

One Army weapon, not yet officially named, would be a high-performance hypersonic missile, tearing through missile defenses at Mach 5-plus to kill critical hardened targets such as command bunkers.
The other, the Strategic Long-Range Cannon (SLRC), would use a gun barrel to launch cheaper, slower missiles at larger numbers of softer targets like radars, missile launchers and mobile command posts.

Together with comparable weapons launched from jets, ships, and submarines, these ground-launched “strategic fires” would blast a path for attacking aircraft, from Army helicopters to Air Force bombers. That kind of mutual support – formally known as Multi-Domain Operations – would transform the Army’s role from a consumer of the other services’ support to a full partner in providing long-range firepower.

Related Articles

Multidomain Battle: Time for a Campaign of Joint Experimentation, National Defense University, 9 January 2018

Multidomain Battle: Converging Concepts Toward a Joint Solution, National Defense University, 10 January 2018

Aiming The Army’s Thousand-Mile Missiles, Breaking Defense, 11 September 2018

Will The Army’s 1,000-Mile Missiles Kill Reagan’s INF Treaty?, Breaking Defense, 12 September 2018

The appearance of external hyperlinks on this DTIC website does not constitute endorsement by the United States Department of Defense (DoD) of the linked websites, or the information, products or services contained therein. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of the United States DoD.