an email newsletter released every month highlighting the latest articles, events, technical inquires, and voices from the community
Differences Between CHIRP Satellites and Persistent UAV Networks
![Differences Between CHIRP Satellites and Persistent UAV Networks https://media.defense.gov/2003/Mar/28/2000031150/780/780/0/030328-F-JZ000-034.JPG / (Image Credit: U.S. Air Force)](https://dsiac.org/wp-content/uploads/bb-plugin/cache/Differences-Between-CHIRP-Satellites-and-Persistent-UAV-Networks-panorama-add6e60b1165d3ef671bbdd109bd9c23-6074583e2c67e.jpg)
https://media.defense.gov/2003/Mar/28/2000031150/780/780/0/030328-F-JZ000-034.JPG / (Image Credit: U.S. Air Force)
Posted on March 30, 2018 | Completed on February 1, 2016 | By: Scott E. Armistead
What are the differences in advantages between commercially hosted infrared payload (CHIRP) satellite and a persistent unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) network?
DSIAC was requested to conduct research in support of a decision on whether to use a commercially hosted IR payload (CHIRP) sensor package or attempting to accomplish a similar mission with a UAV network. DSIAC staff conducted research on the two technology packages and then developed a list of pros and cons of each and submitted a response report to the inquirer.
Want to find out more about this topic?
Request a FREE Technical Inquiry!